![]() I would have four virtual firewalls on my site A (siteA_2200_a_vsxAdmin + siteA_2200_a_vsxNonAdmin + siteA_2200_b_vsxAdmin + siteA_2200_b_vsxNonAdmin) used to buid four IPsec tunnels to site B and four IPsec tunnels to site C. I think to another possibility : is that possible to define two Virtual System on the Checkpoint 2200 to workaround ? In my situation, it is not an easy job considering the large amount of users involved for the heavy client installation. I have notice that I could use Remote Access VPN client to access the desired gateway. And it is not possible de choose specific VPN tunnel neither. I understand that it is not possible to partially overlap encryption domains. Thank you again for your useful explanations and for your substitution proposal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |